Paradox leadership is an incredibly important aspect as a modern leader. In a complex and complicated world, whether you are able to deal with many of the paradoxes faced as a leader today can be crucial to your success as a leader.
Paradoxes can come in many different shapes and sizes, but they have one common feature: they often involve seemingly incompatible demands or opposing goals that require balancing to find the right way forward. Therefore, it requires its man or woman to lead in this field of tension of sometimes opposing expectations, ambitions and goals.
Paradoxes are a natural part of the complex reality of any organization, and how you as a leader handle them can have a decisive impact on the organization's ability to thrive and adapt.
In this blog post, we will therefore dive deeper into paradox management and explore why it has become so crucial in modern organizations, where paradoxes are everywhere, can arise as well as offer some advice on how to best deal with the many paradoxes you encounter as a leader.
What is paradox management and why is it important?
Opposite concepts such as LEAN or situational management Paradox management is not a traditional management methodology, but rather a kind of conceptual toolbox that aims to help managers understand and navigate complex organizational structures. In an era where organizational complexity is typically high, paradox management is essential to promote a holistic and flexible approach to management.
One of the very central aspects of paradox management is the recognition of paradoxes as the perfectly natural part of organizations and companies that they are. Thus, it is more the rule than the exception that companies have one or more significant paradoxes in the organization. As a leader, you should expect to face tensions, conflicts and dilemmas in your daily management practice — especially when it comes to strategy development, leadership, and decision-making.
In fact, you could say that paradoxes constitute a slightly paradoxical size for companies. For these paradoxes that all businesses encounter have both potential benefits and benefits, as well as the potential for devastating consequences. That is why it is crucial how they are handled.
On the positive side, paradoxes hold the potential to strengthen and consolidate your management efforts, especially if you thoroughly analyze the core paradoxes surrounding your organization's products and the value you are trying to create. Paradoxes can actually act as a powerful focus that highlights the necessity of your company's existence by tackling important and challenging tasks. They can also act as catalysts for innovation and innovation, and many leaders find motivation and energy in trying to unbalance them.
On the other hand, paradoxes can also have devastating consequences for both individual leaders and organizations if they are not dealt with constructively. They can, for example, lead to the organization losing its strategic direction. Leaders can get caught in a cycle of reactivity where they constantly try to juggle conflicting demands without having a clear vision or strategy for the future of the organization.
At the same time, it can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction when employees find that their managers cannot deal with paradoxes effectively. They may feel they are being subjected to unfair or inconsistent management decisions, which can negatively affect both their engagement and well-being.
You can also read about: transformational leadership
Read more: Guide to better well-being at work: 5 tips
Classic paradoxes at work
In the workplace, managers and employees almost daily face a number of classic paradoxes that can be challenging to deal with. These paradoxes arise as a result of conflicting demands, goals, and expectations embedded in the structure and culture of the organization. Therefore, it is crucial for effective leadership and organizational success that you as a leader are able to identify and understand these paradoxes.
Below we have listed some of the classic paradoxes that one can encounter as a leader:
Flexibility and stability
One of the most common paradoxes in the workplace is the balance between flexibility and stability. Typically, companies often want to be super agile, and they need to be able to adapt to rapidly changing market conditions. But at the same time, they typically also need some degree of stability and control to maintain efficiency and reliability. This contradiction creates a paradox in which, as a leader, you must strike the right balance between fostering innovation and willingness to change, while maintaining organizational coherence and consistency.
Centralization and decentralization
Another classic paradox is the field of tension between centralization and decentralization of decision-making power. Organizations often want to strengthen employee engagement and autonomy by giving them decision-making power at lower levels — perhaps even developing Self-Guiding Teams. At the same time, however, centralized decision-making structures may be needed to ensure compliance with policies and strategic objectives. Such a paradox requires managers to strike the right balance between delegating power and decision-making authority, while maintaining effective governance of the company.
Hierarchies and organizational structures
Another challenge that may arise is the conflict between maintaining traditional hierarchies while promoting flat organizational structures. Traditional hierarchies provide clarity on responsibilities and roles, but they can also inhibit creativity and innovation. Flat organizational structures can promote collaboration and the exchange of ideas, but they can also create uncertainty about roles and responsibilities. Managers often face the paradox of finding the right organizational structure to suit the needs of the organization.
The examples here show how paradoxes can manifest themselves in the workplace and create challenges for both managers and employees. Recognizing and dealing with these paradoxes requires skill in the art of paradox management, where you as leaders must be able to find creative and innovative solutions to seemingly contradictory demands.
How do you best deal with paradoxes as a leader?
Dealing with paradoxes as a leader requires a conscious approach and the ability to navigate complex and opposing challenges. Jan Heiberg Johansen, author of the book “Paradoxical Leadership — The Pursuit of Value in Complexity”, talks about the fact that there are three essential rules to keep in mind when dealing with paradoxes in your daily work as a leader:
- Reconciling paradoxes: Embracing the tensions that arise rather than trying to hide them is crucial. Often one speaks of the “acceptance” of paradoxes, and this constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for working constructively with them. It is necessary to take tensions seriously, since the different aspects of the paradox are essential for the organization's value creation; otherwise the paradox would not exist as such.
- To look at the entire organization: It is crucial to consider the organization as an integrated entity in interaction with its environment when working with paradoxes and seeking to exploit them for value creation. This is because paradoxes cannot be solved in the same way as ordinary problems that can be identified and solved. Paradoxes persist, and different stakeholders will influence how to work with them.
- To practice a flexibility in tactics: It is essential to be able to use a wide range of paradox tactics in order to adapt one's approach to dealing with the paradoxes. This implies the ability to understand different types of tactics and be able to adapt them according to the need and situation.
The paradox tactics mentioned by Jan Heiberg Johansen are his suggestions on how, as a leader, one can approach the solution of the paradoxes that one encounters. His point is that in the real world it is challenging to separate paradoxes from the tactics we deploy, since they constitute a complex interweaving of paradoxes and our response to them.
In other words, paradoxes are shaped by several factors, such as the requirement to achieve both efficiency and quality with limited resources and tight time frames. Our choice of tactics forms the way in which we try to connect these factors.
Read how to lead with: strategic management
Overall, Jan Heiberg Johansen works with three different categories of tactics for dealing with paradoxes:
Evasion is a tactic in which one tries to deal with paradoxes by separating them into time or space. It will usually involve giving priority to one side of the paradox at a certain point in time and then shifting focus to the other side later. For example, a manager might decide to focus on cost reductions in one quarter and then switch to quality improvements in the next quarter. This tactic may provide a temporary solution and relief, but it does not resolve the paradox in its entirety and may lead to challenges later on.
Activation is a tactic there involves trying to deal with paradoxes by retaining and integrating both sides of the paradox at the same time. Instead of separating them, try to find ways to combine them so that they complement each other. For example, a manager can work to increase both efficiency and quality by implementing new processes and technologies that improve both sides of the paradox. Thus, it is a tactic that often requires creative thinking and innovative solutions, but it can lead to more sustainable results.
Transcendence is about trying to transcend the paradoxes by finding a higher level of solutions or perspectives that make the paradox irrelevant or less limiting. It implies being able to think beyond the traditional ways of dealing with paradoxes and search for new approaches that can transform the paradox into an opportunity. For example, a manager may try to develop a new business model that allows achieving both efficiency and quality in a way that was not previously possible. These tactics often require a new mindset and a willingness to challenge conventional perceptions.
In paradox management, it is important to choose the right tactics depending on the situation and the specific paradox you are facing. Sometimes it may be necessary to employ a combination of tactics to achieve the best results. The key is to understand that paradoxes are a natural part of modern management and that there are different approaches to dealing with them constructively.
